How Things Work : How Nuclear Energy Works

How Things Work : How Nuclear Energy Works

Nuclear energy works in much the same way as traditional energy, except it requires less fuel to work and has harmful byproducts. Discover how nuclear energy…

Short segment exposing the baseless paranoia and propaganda promoted by the radical environmentalist movement and bureaucrats concerning nuclear energy and l…
Video Rating: 0 / 5

Tags: , , , ,

50 Responses to “How Things Work : How Nuclear Energy Works” Subscribe

  1. XXJKL200XX May 21, 2013 at 3:10 am #

    thanks

    

  2. ElectricTomorrow May 21, 2013 at 3:18 am #

    3:04

  3. Sikucrutz May 21, 2013 at 3:54 am #

    no

  4. yougonasorry May 21, 2013 at 4:21 am #

    he never said Uranium was a fossil fuel, he just said its naturally occurring

  5. hh1n May 21, 2013 at 4:43 am #

    Am I the only one with shit-poor Internet?

  6. luigi malezan May 21, 2013 at 5:34 am #

    am I the only 9 year old waching this?

  7. Al-Ḥasan Shen May 21, 2013 at 5:56 am #

    Nuclear power is not a fossil fuel! Why do so many people not realize this basic fact about nuclear power yet still hate, fear and want to destroy it?

  8. CrudeDude May 21, 2013 at 6:16 am #

    I read THIS years ago;

    “ROUTINE RADIOACTIVE RELEASES FROM NUCLEAR REACTORS – IT DOESN’T TAKE AN ACCIDENT”

  9. puncheex May 21, 2013 at 6:30 am #

    @CrudeDude: Why, how clairvoyent of you. I only wrote it in the last week. Tell you what – read the subtitle to the screed you don’t want to read about. That line should tell you all you need to know.

  10. CrudeDude May 21, 2013 at 6:40 am #

    Don’t bother to send it to me. I read it years ago. Do you still claim it a Conspiracy Theory as you indicated a week ago?

  11. puncheex May 21, 2013 at 7:37 am #

    @CrudeDude: Went to the site you said all your data is on. Found a sheet entitled “ROUTINE RADIOACTIVE RELEASES FROM NUCLEAR REACTORS – IT DOESN’T TAKE AN ACCIDENT”. Two pages long, I expanded it somewhat, to eight pages. But it seems you aren’t in a mood for messages, and I’m surely not going to break it into 500 character pieces. So, give me a channel and I’ll send it. Needless to say, the errors and omissions are there. And I’ve learned some in the research as well.

  12. CrudeDude May 21, 2013 at 7:50 am #

    It’s been a week. Still waitin’…

  13. puncheex May 21, 2013 at 8:26 am #

    @CrudeDude: Unlike what you are probably used to, I’m accustomed to actually following up on links and such, so I’m exploring your NIRS site. Having a good time; I’ll let you know about it in due course.

  14. CrudeDude May 21, 2013 at 9:22 am #

    Still waitin’…

  15. CrudeDude May 21, 2013 at 9:33 am #

    Well, I’m waiting…

  16. CrudeDude May 21, 2013 at 10:01 am #

    YOUR words are obviously for “obscuration”. My words are simply for clarity. Routine releases by reactors is not a Conspiricy Theory. It’s a well known, documented fact.

  17. CrudeDude May 21, 2013 at 10:46 am #

    Data?
    Sure ! Here ya go;
     .nirs. org/ factsheets / routine radioactive releases. pdf

  18. puncheex May 21, 2013 at 11:28 am #

    @CrudeDude: OK. I get your CT here, though your URL is no longer available. “Radioactive gases routinely emitted”. Sounds like a CT. You are aware of the monitoring done around the plants, right? The reporting procedures? And, yes, at various times these have been screwed up by various operators, but routine is hardly the word. Do you have any real data about these “routine” incidents? Data less than ten years old? Let’s see the data; words are meant for obscuration.

  19. CrudeDude May 21, 2013 at 12:10 pm #

    Reactors leak plumes of krypton 90 routinely. We’ve established this. The same is the case with krypton 89 gas. Such plumes make their way through a reactor and are exhausted before the 25-35 minutes it takes for full decay of gaseous kr-89 to solid-form (rubidium-89 and then) strontium-89

  20. CrudeDude May 21, 2013 at 1:02 pm #

    The stack is used for venting radioactive gasses routinely emmited during normal reactor operation.
    Incinerator? That’s truly laughable. Nice try. Diesel generators with a stack 10 feet in diameter? You’re delusional. Funny, but delusional.

  21. puncheex May 21, 2013 at 1:17 pm #

    @CrudeDude: Actually, I was Right, but you want a gotcha. Why don’t you stop jaqing off and just state your claims and we can argue about than rather than playing head games? I suppose some stations have to have stacks for their emergency diesel generators; perhaps some have incinerators. So let’s hear your CT and we can all have a laugh, OK?

  22. CrudeDude May 21, 2013 at 1:21 pm #

    Wrong! I know what a cooling tower is, what it looks like, how it works and what it cools. Some nuclear power plants have stacks. Why does a ” clean” source of energy need a tall stack?

    PS The question is rhetorical. I KNOW what is sent up the stack.

  23. puncheex May 21, 2013 at 1:36 pm #

    @puncheex: The reason for their shape and their height is to effect air movement through them without fans. They pipe the hot water up above the air intakes around the base, encouraging air to take the heat and rise through the stack, sucking more air in at the bottom. As it rises through the water, it absorbs some of the water and the heat of evaporation and vents it at the top. Nothing but air and water.

  24. CrudeDude May 21, 2013 at 2:15 pm #

    

    Q. Why do some nuclear plants have stacks?

    Q. What come out of those stacks that they can’t release at ground level?

  25. thenuclearfriends May 21, 2013 at 2:25 pm #

    Commercial and utility plants currently use nuclear fission reactions to heat water to produce steam, which is then used to generate electricity. A nuclear reaction is the process in which two nuclei, or else a nucleus of an atom and a subatomic particle from outside the atom, collide to produce products different from the initial particles. The nucleus is the very dense region consisting of nucleons (protons and neutrons) at the center of an atom.

    Watch our Budhiya Video “Ek Tha Budhiya”

  26. XXJKL200XX May 21, 2013 at 2:39 pm #

    thanks

    

  27. ElectricTomorrow May 21, 2013 at 3:15 pm #

    3:04

  28. Sikucrutz May 21, 2013 at 4:09 pm #

    no

  29. yougonasorry May 21, 2013 at 5:03 pm #

    he never said Uranium was a fossil fuel, he just said its naturally occurring

  30. hh1n May 21, 2013 at 5:07 pm #

    Am I the only one with shit-poor Internet?

  31. luigi malezan May 21, 2013 at 5:15 pm #

    am I the only 9 year old waching this?

  32. Al-Ḥasan Shen May 21, 2013 at 6:09 pm #

    Nuclear power is not a fossil fuel! Why do so many people not realize this basic fact about nuclear power yet still hate, fear and want to destroy it?

  33. CrudeDude May 21, 2013 at 6:32 pm #

    I read THIS years ago;

    “ROUTINE RADIOACTIVE RELEASES FROM NUCLEAR REACTORS – IT DOESN’T TAKE AN ACCIDENT”

  34. puncheex May 21, 2013 at 6:50 pm #

    @CrudeDude: Why, how clairvoyent of you. I only wrote it in the last week. Tell you what – read the subtitle to the screed you don’t want to read about. That line should tell you all you need to know.

  35. CrudeDude May 21, 2013 at 6:52 pm #

    Don’t bother to send it to me. I read it years ago. Do you still claim it a Conspiracy Theory as you indicated a week ago?

  36. puncheex May 21, 2013 at 7:48 pm #

    @CrudeDude: Went to the site you said all your data is on. Found a sheet entitled “ROUTINE RADIOACTIVE RELEASES FROM NUCLEAR REACTORS – IT DOESN’T TAKE AN ACCIDENT”. Two pages long, I expanded it somewhat, to eight pages. But it seems you aren’t in a mood for messages, and I’m surely not going to break it into 500 character pieces. So, give me a channel and I’ll send it. Needless to say, the errors and omissions are there. And I’ve learned some in the research as well.

  37. CrudeDude May 21, 2013 at 8:43 pm #

    It’s been a week. Still waitin’…

  38. puncheex May 21, 2013 at 9:01 pm #

    @CrudeDude: Unlike what you are probably used to, I’m accustomed to actually following up on links and such, so I’m exploring your NIRS site.  Having a good time; I’ll let you know about it in due course.

  39. CrudeDude May 21, 2013 at 9:28 pm #

     Still waitin’…

  40. CrudeDude May 21, 2013 at 10:02 pm #

     Well, I’m waiting…

  41. CrudeDude May 21, 2013 at 10:52 pm #

    YOUR words are obviously for “obscuration”. My words are simply for clarity. Routine releases by reactors is not a Conspiricy Theory. It’s a well known, documented fact.

  42. CrudeDude May 21, 2013 at 11:04 pm #

    Data?
    Sure ! Here ya go;
    .nirs. org/ factsheets / routine radioactive releases. pdf

  43. puncheex May 21, 2013 at 11:56 pm #

    @CrudeDude: OK. I get your CT here, though your URL is no longer available. “Radioactive gases routinely emitted”. Sounds like a CT. You are aware of the monitoring done around the plants, right? The reporting procedures? And, yes, at various times these have been screwed up by various operators, but routine is hardly the word. Do you have any real data about these “routine” incidents? Data less than ten years old? Let’s see the data; words are meant for obscuration.

  44. CrudeDude May 22, 2013 at 12:22 am #

    Reactors leak plumes of krypton 90 routinely. We’ve established this. The same is the case with krypton 89 gas. Such plumes make their way through a reactor and are exhausted before the 25-35 minutes it takes for full decay of gaseous kr-89 to solid-form (rubidium-89 and then) strontium-89

  45. CrudeDude May 22, 2013 at 1:13 am #

    The stack is used for venting radioactive gasses routinely emmited during normal reactor operation.
    Incinerator? That’s truly laughable. Nice try. Diesel generators with a stack 10 feet in diameter? You’re delusional. Funny, but delusional.

  46. puncheex May 22, 2013 at 1:30 am #

    @CrudeDude: Actually, I was Right, but you want a gotcha. Why don’t you stop jaqing off and just state your claims and we can argue about than rather than playing head games? I suppose some stations have to have stacks for their emergency diesel generators; perhaps some have incinerators. So let’s hear your CT and we can all have a laugh, OK?

  47. CrudeDude May 22, 2013 at 1:41 am #

    Wrong! I know what a cooling tower is, what it looks like, how it works and what it cools. Some nuclear power plants have stacks. Why does a ” clean” source of energy need a tall stack?

    PS The question is rhetorical. I KNOW what is sent up the stack.

  48. puncheex May 22, 2013 at 2:01 am #

    @puncheex: The reason for their shape and their height is to effect air movement through them without fans. They pipe the hot water up above the air intakes around the base, encouraging air to take the heat and rise through the stack, sucking more air in at the bottom. As it rises through the water, it absorbs some of the water and the heat of evaporation and vents it at the top. Nothing but air and water.

  49. CrudeDude May 22, 2013 at 2:27 am #

    Q. Why do some nuclear plants have stacks?

    Q. What come out of those stacks that they can’t release at ground level?

  50. thenuclearfriends May 22, 2013 at 2:35 am #

    Commercial and utility plants currently use nuclear fission reactions to heat water to produce steam, which is then used to generate electricity. A nuclear reaction is the process in which two nuclei, or else a nucleus of an atom and a subatomic particle from outside the atom, collide to produce products different from the initial particles. The nucleus is the very dense region consisting of nucleons (protons and neutrons) at the center of an atom.

    Watch our Budhiya Video “Ek Tha Budhiya”

Spanish Crisis Triggers Real Estate Price Collapse

Baltimore, MD (PRWEB) June 29, 2012 A move by Spanish banks to offload the build-up of foreclosed properties on their [...]

Self Storage Provider Coronado Mobile Storage Joins Forces with LAD Solutions in Promoting Storage Containers as Mobile Offices

San Diego, CA (PRWEB) July 03, 2012 With the collapse in real estate prices and explosive growth in home foreclosures [...]

Real Estate Prices LOFTS DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES FOR SALE AND LEASE RENTALS

Real Estate Prices LOFTS DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES FOR SALE AND LEASE RENTALS. LA loft prices and market report Corey Chambers, [...]

Mortgage Rates Drop to New Record Lows Influencing Increase In Refinancing and Home Building Activity According to BurlingtonMortgage.biz

Wilmington, NC (PRWEB) July 24, 2012 Mortgage rates have reached a new historical low point for 30 year fixed, 15 [...]

NFIB Stated Confidence in Small Business Takes a Steep Drop XSM Services aimed to Restore Faith

Denver, Colorado (PRWEB) January 30, 2013 After the recession took its toll on the U.S. economy, the fiscal cliff and [...]

Junior State of America Releases Winter 2013 Edition of Student-Run Magazine, The Junior Statement

Washington, DC (PRWEB) January 31, 2013 The Junior State of America (JSA) today released the Winter 2013 Edition of The [...]